Sixty-Three - Women Left Grasping At Damage Control


SIXTY-THREE





Women Left Grasping At Damage Control







“So, back to basics, ladies, because we have to try to manage whatever damage control we can, here, and, since the Supreme Court used bought women’s safety as being an issue, then every issue that we raise about women and children’s health and safety has to matter constitutionally as well. So, we need strict health regulations in those houses of bought women, just like restaurants have, to protect the public. Restaurants are shut down, if health regulations aren’t respected, and the spread of intimately transmitted diseases make the laws about paid women matter a thousand times more. But how does one police legally having to use a condom? And even if it’s stupid not to wear one, men have been proven stupid. They wouldn’t touch another man’s spewing directly, but they send their dick in to touch a variety of it, wherever they send their manhood, into a bought woman. Well, it’s that utter irresponsibility that we have to lessen and to protect against, through tough laws.”



“An establishment that does not enforce prophylactic laws will lose its license forever, and everyone involved will face criminal charges. If just one bought woman allows it, she’ll lose her license, face the justice system, and the whole place will be shut down for a health regulation violation, and there will be increasing penalties with every shutdown, until a certain amount of strikes shuts down the business for good. Undercover inspectors will test the women. Guess that’ll be a fun job. And a doctor will be at every licensed house, to thoroughly visually inspect all paid women before their shift. Think gynecologist stirrups, light and all.”



“The law must no longer shy away from prison time for anyone who kills through intimately transmitted diseases. Doctors and labs who do the testing must be extremely liable. And men must have regular STD checks and blood tests, which they pay for, during and for two years after they’ve last been with a bought woman. Results will be registered in a data base. There will be no privacy bull about confidential medical databases, since public health is at stake. We have immunity rules for kids, for them to be in school. So, in the case of men behaving like immature children . . . ”



“There has to be a registry, in every licensed house, of every man who goes there, so that, if a plaything becomes infected with anything, all the men can be contacted, and, since public health already does keep track of some infections as it is, that’s not farfetched. But when there’s a new intimately transmitted disease that paid women aren’t being tested for yet, just how many non-consenting girlfriends and wives will die because of what bought women and men do? And how unfair is that? Men are the reckless ones who put it all on the line to screw. Women, on the other hand, put their lives on the line for their children.”



“Did I mention that I like ‘bought women’ because it’s like ‘bot-women?’ And how perfect is that term?”



“Even if the condom law were to be mostly respected by men, even if they at least showed a brain and some care there, prophylactics aren’t fail proof. And a man sticking his dick into a paid woman, that’s like a man sticking his arm into a fire: if protection fails in either case, injury will occur.”   



“And how many men do you know who use protection when getting mouth action, uh?”



“Paid women have to be made to get all the vaccines for intimately transmitted diseases, and they have to get them as soon as they’re available. And, of course, they or their employer have to pay for them. And there has to be legal, witnessed proof that they got the immunization, and it has to go into their licensing file. Because people in the adult film entertainment industry have rules like that, in order to protect the performers, but, in this case, everyone has to be protected, because men have now made the whole country a soundstage for such awful . . .”



“We certainly can’t allow men to load up and then open fire on women with their organic weapons. Real guns require licenses because they’re deadly. Well, ditto the other kind. And the results of the testing should also go to the girlfriend a man lives with, or to his wife. With every man showing government-issued ID when he’s tested, in order to make the whole process secure, so there’s no cheating there, even though men believe that cheating on and lying to a girlfriend or wife is just fine and acceptable. When it comes to a woman’s health and very life, however, that just can’t be.”



“What about men who come in from other countries and who want access to the bought women here? They’ll just come in and increase this country’s disease load, and then leave again. Great.”



Silence.



“If we could make it illegal for men who are married or who are living with a woman to go bought women . . .  If a man prefers paid women, then he should just have platonic relationships with other women in society.”



“Inversely, if a man has an intimately transmitted disease and then enters into a relationship with a non-whore, he should have to get a legal document saying that she knows.”



“Why couldn’t we take baby steps? Like, hand job and boob job salons? Those are safe. An opened lay out. Stalls built in a way that allows everyone to see above and beneath, just not the middle part. Or that at least allow to see the feet, which must remain on the floor at all times. A safety camera would record all day. Workers would have to wear bottoms at all times. Disinfectant would be used on the chairs, since men would have their pants off or lowered, and also used on female body parts too, I guess, between clients. And regular testing for all the women servicing the men, of course.”



“No saliva. No warts on her hands. Selling the work of a hand or of breasts is not selling much. Carpal tunnel syndrome maybe in it for her, though.”



“Yeah, even mouth action isn’t cheating, as long as the woman’s not a man’s date or mistress, and won’t ever be. But diseases transmitted that way, however . . . ”



“There have to be strict laws against any kind of contact outside work between clients and suppliers of intimate pleasure. Like the laws that stop doctors and teachers from being with patients and students. And no real names, no personal information can be given to clients.”           



“Will professional ethics also stop others as well, like cops, from going to bought women? A CEO who spoke out against gay marriage lost his job. A man who made racist comments lost his sports team. Well, disrespecting women matters as well. And think of doctors treating women, once they see them all as inferior because they use some of them all the time. How many women will die, because they’re seen as just toys? Across the board, things like that will happen, when it comes to how men deal with all women, once they use some of them regularly and legally. Once they are used to degrading them.”



“What happens to the semen in those businesses? Imagine a paid woman taking it and getting herself pregnant with it. Then that man would have to pay child support for eighteen years.”



“Oh, please can that happen, like, a lot?”



“I know: we could pay the bought women to sell it to us, then get it tested, and use it. They could have quite the business thing going there.”



“Better for men, then, to always be able to leave with their spewing.”



“Or, men will get vasectomies when young, and so, no kids for women later.”



“Okay, so there should be a law making vasectomies illegal before a certain age. And a law that makes men have to declare having had one, after dating a woman for a month. You do know that everything that’s important to men has endless laws about it, right? So, women wishing that we could pass all these laws about what matters to us, it’s not crazy, because men do it.”



“No-fault divorce saves men and their precious money, well, we have to save precious lives. But all the safeguards that should be put in place. Will they be?”



“If we don’t have men helping us out to make it happen, then . . . no.”




Comment